Balanced vs Front Loaded Rotation: Which is Better?
I’m going to try and simplify the analysis in the coming set of articles. Using odd Sabermetrical stats can be useful when looking at certain sets of data – such as comparing players of different eras– but for the most part they just add a level of confusion. I certainly subscribe to the KISS principle in day-to-day life, so it’s time to start practing it here. Now that my little rant is over, let’s take care of business!
Recently, one of the esteemed co-columnists at the Mop Up Duty (Early), wrote an article on the Toronto Blue Jays off-season pitching needs. I’m not going to speak for him, so here is a little quote from the comments section of his article:
“… the article is proposing a balanced approach, riding Doc’s coattails, much like Minnesota rode Liriano’s pre-ASG and Santana post-ASG, all you need from the rest of your staff is to play average ball.â€
(That reminds me, we’re getting a ton of visitors but few comments. Make your voice heard! If you think we’re on to something, let us know. If you think we’re full of crap, kindly let us know.)
Ok, so the basic assumption is this; Let Doc be Doc, have AJ produce an average AJ type year and have the rest of staff hover around .500.
Let’s look into this. We all know that Halladay is one of the best, and certainly the most under-rated pitcher in all of baseball. He should have a strong thirty or so starts like he does every year. Well, this theory is nothing new to the Blue Jays.
Round the bases and read the rest of Balanced vs Front Loaded Rotation: Which is Better?